Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Welfare group hits out at primate research review

Report into multiple neuroscience research procedures on primates sparks RSPCA

CONCERNS have been raised by the RSPCA over a published report into the impact of neuroscience research on primates.

The report, "Review of the assessment of cumulative severity and lifetime experience in non-human primates used in neuroscience research," by the former UK Animal Procedures Committee,  considers the long-term implications of procedures on primates.

RSPCA's chief scientific officer, Maggy Jennings, OBE, said: “It is extremely concerning that this report systematically underestimates the serious impact of neuroscience research on primates and the level of suffering involved.


“How anyone can think that confinement in cages, being subjected to repeated scientific procedures including surgery, the implantation of eye coils or head implants and electrodes, food and water deprivation, long periods of restraint, and the catalogue of other adverse effects listed causes anything other than severe suffering is completely beyond us.


The report provides the first detailed account into this sensitive area of animal research of the nature, incidence and severity of procedures and complications, including their cumulative impact.


According to the Government's Animals in Science Committee, which published the report, the review also identified issues specific to the concepts of cumulative severity and lifetime experience that should be subject to further and future debate.


Maggy Jennings added: "We will be reviewing the report and its recommendations in very close detail to ensure that where constructive recommendations have been made that could reduce primate suffering, that they are immediately implemented.”


www.gov.uk/government/publications/animal-procedures-committee-cumulative-severity-review

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets launch new podcast for pet owners

News Story 1
 Two independent vets have launched a podcast to help owners strengthen their bond with pets. Dr Maggie Roberts and Dr Vanessa Howie, who have worked in both veterinary practice and major charities, are keen to use their experience to enable people to give pets a better life.

The venture, called Vets Talking Pets, provides advice and information on a range of topics, including how to select a suitable pet, where to obtain them and how to get the best out of your vet. Maggie and Vanessa will also discuss sensitive subjects, including end-of-life care, raw food diets and the cost of veterinary care.

The podcast can be found on all the usual podcast sites, including Podbean, Apple, Amazon Music and YouTube. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
VMD issues guidance on AVM-GSL packaging

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has shared advice on its requirements for medicines considered AVM-GSL.

The guidance explains the information that should be on the outer package, and sets out the typical maximum pack size for an AVM-GSL product. It also describes the user-friendly language, structure and phrases required on packaging and product leaflets.

AVM-GSL products do not require discussion between the purchaser and a veterinary professional. This means that clear product information is needed to support sales choices.

The information will be useful for submitting new products to the AVM-GSL category and lowering the distribution category of products from NFA-VPS to AVM-GSL.

The VMD's guidance can be accessed here.