No evidence that badger vaccination a viable alternative to culling, he says
The president of the BVA, Robin Hargreaves spoke of misinformation about bovine TB, and concerns about the pet travel scheme changes, at the organisation's sixth annual dinner.
Mr Hargreaves said Government decisions on TB testing and veterinary surveillance, should be based on quality of service as well as costs, and should recognise the value of trusted relationships between veterinary surgeons and their farm clients in terms of biosecurity and other advice.
“In some large animal and mixed practices, predominantly in rural areas, there has been additional worry about the impact of the Government’s decision to procure bovine TB testing of cattle by tender.
"We remain unconvinced that tendering is the only available route, but we acknowledge the significant budgetary pressures on Government to reduce the overall cost of TB testing," he said.
“We need to eradicate the diseases we’ve got, and keep out the ones that we don’t have with a robust veterinary surveillance system.
"That’s why we have stated repeatedly that changes to the existing surveillance system must not be based on cost alone. If we lose our capacity to protect the UK from disease incursion it will be impossible to get it back.”
“The Independent Expert Panel has to be given time to produce a thorough report, but while we wait it is frustrating to see misinformation filling the void.
"Some in the media are painting a picture in which policymakers have a straight choice between vaccinating badgers and culling them. That picture is false. And it is damaging.
“Badger vaccination clearly has a role to play in the eradication of bovine TB, and we were pleased to see it included in the Government’s TB strategy, but there is no evidence to suggest that it is currently a viable alternative to culling in the fight against the disease in cattle in the endemic areas.
"And it is wrong to suggest that any of the measures we need to tackle bovine TB can be successful in isolation.
“We fully recognise that this is a highly emotive subject and our own position was not taken lightly. But it is essential that the public debate is well informed and based on fact.
"We will continue to do the best we can to add the veterinary perspective to the conversation.”
Mr Hargreaves said slaughter without pre-stunning was the single issue that caused the most concern among BVA members.
“It is also the issue on which we have a huge amount of political support, but on which the Government feels its hands are tied," he said.
“We must remember that this concerns millions of individual animals. That is why we have been seeking to find practical solutions.
"For these animals we want to see post-cut stunning to reduce the individual harm. And we want to see a system of labelling that would reduce the likelihood of products entering the mainstream market, which in turn would reduce the total number of animals affected.”
Speaking at the dinner in London of February 25, Mr Hargreaves also warned of an increased risk of rabies, echinococcus and other diseases as a result of non-commercial pet travel schemes being abused by organised gangs.
“We absolutely don’t want to be alarmist about these risks, but once criminal activity is involved all bets are off.
"We support moves towards a minimum age of vaccination of 12 weeks so that no puppy can come into the country until it is at least 15 weeks old.
"Of course the simplest way to reverse the recent trend is to increase the waiting time before animals can enter the UK even further. But that decision is not within our gift, and without the support of other member states it is unlikely to happen.
“Sadly, none of this activity is able to address the hidden welfare breaches being inflicted upon the breeding stock back in their home countries.
"This is the invisible harm being caused by the impulse buying of puppies sourced from abroad. We would always recommend that people do their research, seek out reputable breeders at home, and be prepared to be a little more patient.”