Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

"Questionable results" yielded by feline diabetes research
cat
Dr Niessen says human-style clinical trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of different treatments.
RVC's systematic review finds more collaboration and larger sample sizes are needed

Past research on feline diabetes lacks collaboration and is based on low-level evidence, leading to "questionable results". This is according to a systematic review of research papers carried out by the Royal Veterinary College (RVC).

"Current research into the condition is sporadic, lacking a long-term vision and not collaborative," says Dr Stijn Niessan, who launched the RVC's Feline Diabetic Remission Clinic (FDRC) with his team in 2013.

Dr Niessan believes human-style clinical trials are the best method to compare remission rates with different types of insulin.

"The only way to improve the quality of research and its results is to design and implement well-structured clinical trials, similar to those used by pharmaceutical companies in human medicine.

“This sort of trial can have a powerful impact on a treatment and how it is used. They can more accurately gauge the pros and cons of specific diabetic treatments for cats, helping us pinpoint troublesome side effects as well as identifying the benefits."

Researchers say treatment recommendations are based on past research with sample sizes of as few as eight cat and the largest samples contained 50 to 60 cats. Statistical tests carried out by the FDRC team suggest that a minimum of 80 to 90 cats are required to accurately compare different treatments.

Dr Niessan says more collaboration is needed both nationally and internationally to address the inconsistencies in the treatment of feline diabetes.

"A pet owner can, in theory, go to two different vets and get two very different treatments for the same condition," he explains. "The owner could then go online and find a third way. These treatments aren’t necessarily wrong, it is just one vet may have been trained in one methodology and another in a different way.

"This is why a collaborative approach is so important, so we can end these inconsistencies and can get closer to the actual truth about which way best to treat our feline friends."

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Submissions open for BSAVA Clinical Research Abstracts 2026

News Story 1
 The BSAVA has opened submissions for the BSAVA Clinical Research Abstracts 2026.

It is an opportunity for applicants to present new research on any veterinary subject, such as the preliminary results of a study, discussion of a new technique or a description of an interesting case.

They must be based on high-quality clinical research conducted in industry, practice or academia, and summarised in 250 words.

Applications are welcome from vets, vet nurses, practice managers, and students.

Submissions are open until 6 March 2026. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Survey seeks ruminant sector views on antimicrobial stewardship

A new survey is seeking views of people working in the UK ruminant sector on how to tackle the challenge of demonstrating responsible antibiotic stewardship.

Forming part of a wider, collaborative initiative, the results will help identify the types of data available so that challenges with data collection can be better understood and addressed.

Anyone working in the UK farming sector, including vets and farmers,is encouraged to complete the survey, which is available at app.onlinesurveys.jisc.ac.uk