Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Pigswill ban 'should be reassessed', scientists say
pigs eating
Feeding swill - or food waste - to pigs was banned in 2002 as there was evidence to suggest it was to blame for the 2001 outbreak of foot-and-mouth.
BVA raises concerns about new study
 
A team of Cambridge scientists has said the EU ban on pig swill feeding should be reconsidered.

Feeding swill - or food waste - to pigs was banned in 2002 as there was evidence to suggest it was to blame for the 2001 outbreak of foot-and-mouth.

But researchers from the University of Cambridge say that 1.8 million hectares of land could be saved by lifting the ban and creating pig feed using 'heat treated' food waste.

Heat treating techniques are used in East Asian countries such as Japan to recycle food waste as animal feed.

In a new study published in the journal Food Policy, the research team argue that lifting the ban would not only reduce the amount of land needed by the pork industry, but could also cut feed costs by 50 per cent and provide a use for over 100 million tonnes of food that is wasted in the EU every year.

Lead author Erasmus zu Ermgassen said: "It is time to reassess whether the EU’s blanket ban on the use of food waste as feed is the right thing for the pig industry."

Responding to the study, BVA's senior vice-president John Blackwell told MRCVSonline: "The cost and carbon footprint that would be made in sourcing, transporting and effectively heat treating pigswill for the five million production pigs in the UK would likely be phenomenal, and so could tip the balance against any potential gains this paper says could be made in tackling our food waste problem."

Mr Blackwell also raised concerns about the difficulty of enforcing a heat treating system to the extent that no traces of meat, including pork products, made their way into the feed.

"The commercial pig industry in the UK/EU strives to produce top quality products that are safe for consumers, and the variable nutritional quality of pigswill would not assist this," he said.

Prof zu Ermgassen also quotes concerning figures from a survey that found 25 per cent of smallholder farmers in the UK admit to illegally feeding uncooked food waste to their pigs. Mr Blackwell called the statistic "very worrying" and said this must be addressed.

"The fact they've managed to do this and get away with it so far is not a reason for reversing a well thought-through ban," he added.

Read the full study: Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919215001256

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
New guidance for antibiotic use in rabbits

New best practice guidance on the responsible use of antibiotics in rabbits has been published by the BSAVA in collaboration with the Rabbit Welfare Association & Fund (RWA&F).

The guidance is free and has been produced to help veterinary practitioners select the most appropriate antibiotic for rabbits. It covers active substance, dose and route of administration all of which are crucial factors when treating rabbits owing to the risk of enterotoxaemia.

For more information and to access the guide, visit the BSAVALibrary.