Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

MPs urged to launch inquiry into sheep dip poisoning
OP sheep dips were banned in 1999 over fears that some farmers were being made sick by the chemicals.

Campaign group looks forward to giving evidence

MPs are being urged to launch an inquiry into concerns that people working with organophosphate (OP) sheep dip were poisoned.

OP sheep dips were banned in 1999 over fears that some farmers were being made sick by the chemicals.

Figures obtained by The Sheep Dip Sufferers Group (SDSG) earlier this year revealed there were 160 occasions where some form of ill-health occurred after dipping. 

However, only three of these cases were reported to MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food) or the Veterinary Medicines Directorate.

Speaking to the Farmer’s Weekly, campaign co-ordinator Tom Rigby said that the time had come for a full inquiry into the issue and that the group looks forward to giving evidence ‘as soon as possible’.

His comments follow a parliamentary question raised by Newport East MP Jessica Morden last Thursday (24 November). According to Farmers Weekly, Ms Morden told parliament that documents showed there were long-term heath effects from using sheep dip.

When she asked farming minister George Eustice if he could meet the group - as he had done in the past - he replied by saying the committee on toxicity had looked at the issue exhaustively, examining 26 different studies over a period of more than a decade.

The committee had “concluded that in the absence of acute poisoning there would not be meaningful long-term effects,” he continued.

Mr Rigby told Farmers Weekly that the response showed Mr Eustice was not taking the matter seriously.

“In any other department, to dismiss concerns about health and safety by saying the issue had been looked at exhaustively and could find no evidence of long-term effect in those who had not been affected would not be considered an adequate response,” he said. “We do not think those involved in agriculture should be treated in such a shoddy manner.”

Over the last 18 months, George Eustice had been working with the SDSG in trying to raise awareness of the issue.

In 2015, he met with farmworkers who had been affected by OP dips - the first minister to do so in over 20 years. He also helped to ensure the release of blood test results, taken by MAFF in the early 1990s.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets launch new podcast for pet owners

News Story 1
 Two independent vets have launched a podcast to help owners strengthen their bond with pets. Dr Maggie Roberts and Dr Vanessa Howie, who have worked in both veterinary practice and major charities, are keen to use their experience to enable people to give pets a better life.

The venture, called Vets Talking Pets, provides advice and information on a range of topics, including how to select a suitable pet, where to obtain them and how to get the best out of your vet. Maggie and Vanessa will also discuss sensitive subjects, including end-of-life care, raw food diets and the cost of veterinary care.

The podcast can be found on all the usual podcast sites, including Podbean, Apple, Amazon Music and YouTube. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
VMD issues guidance on AVM-GSL packaging

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has shared advice on its requirements for medicines considered AVM-GSL.

The guidance explains the information that should be on the outer package, and sets out the typical maximum pack size for an AVM-GSL product. It also describes the user-friendly language, structure and phrases required on packaging and product leaflets.

AVM-GSL products do not require discussion between the purchaser and a veterinary professional. This means that clear product information is needed to support sales choices.

The information will be useful for submitting new products to the AVM-GSL category and lowering the distribution category of products from NFA-VPS to AVM-GSL.

The VMD's guidance can be accessed here.