Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

NOAH clarifies critically important antibiotics
Antibiotics
"All classes of antibiotics, whether critically important or not, should be used responsibly" - Donal Murphy, NOAH.
Document divides antimicrobials into risk categories

A document to clarify which antibiotics should be considered as critically important has been published by the National Office of Animal Health (NOAH).

The document comes after an assessment by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and aims to clear up any confusion about which antibiotics should be considered in this group.

Carried out by the Antimicrobial Advice Ad Hoc Expert Group (AMEG), the work has resulted in the further categorisation of critically important antibiotics (CIAs) into risk categories.

Category one contains antimicrobials that are considered a low or limited risk to public health. It includes macrolides, certain penicillins and tetracyclines. NOAH states that these ‘should be used with current responsible use practices to keep their risk low’.

Category two contains antimicrobials that are considered a high risk to public health. This includes fluroquinolones, 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins and colistin. NOAH adds that these antimicrobials ‘should only be used when there are no alternative antimicrobials authorised for the respected target species and indication’.

“NOAH believes the classification and use of antibiotics in veterinary medicine should be driven and guided by the regulators, who are independent and make science based decisions and recommendations,” said Donal Murphy, head of technical and regulatory affairs at NOAH.

“Of course, all classes of antibiotics, whether critically important or not, should be used responsibly and guided by the principle outlined by the Responsible Use of Medicines in Agriculture Alliance (RUMA) who state they should be used ‘as little as possible but as much as necessary’.

“The use of these important products in this manner can ensure that the availability and efficacy of antibiotics can be maintained to ensure animal health and welfare in the future,” he adds.

To view the document and other NOAH briefing documents on antibiotics visit noah.co.uk.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Submissions open for BSAVA Clinical Research Abstracts 2026

News Story 1
 The BSAVA has opened submissions for the BSAVA Clinical Research Abstracts 2026.

It is an opportunity for applicants to present new research on any veterinary subject, such as the preliminary results of a study, discussion of a new technique or a description of an interesting case.

They must be based on high-quality clinical research conducted in industry, practice or academia, and summarised in 250 words.

Applications are welcome from vets, vet nurses, practice managers, and students.

Submissions are open until 6 March 2026. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Survey seeks ruminant sector views on antimicrobial stewardship

A new survey is seeking views of people working in the UK ruminant sector on how to tackle the challenge of demonstrating responsible antibiotic stewardship.

Forming part of a wider, collaborative initiative, the results will help identify the types of data available so that challenges with data collection can be better understood and addressed.

Anyone working in the UK farming sector, including vets and farmers,is encouraged to complete the survey, which is available at app.onlinesurveys.jisc.ac.uk