Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

New study sheds light on rabbit handling
If future research identifies more appropriate handling methods, researchers said this information must be consistent and available across a wide range of media.
Further research needed to determine rabbits’ experiences 

A new survey suggests the most popular method of rabbit handling is supporting the animal’s body against the chest, while ‘scruffing’ with rear support is the least popular.

Researchers carried out an online survey of pet owners, breeders, veterinary staff and laboratory personnel, who were shown photographs of five different handling methods.

Out of 2,644 respondents, 86.2 per cent said they had used method B (supporting rabbits against the chest); compared to method E (scruffing), which was used by 15.3 per cent.

Other methods studied were:
  • Method A - Rabbit supported with both arms (63.6 per cent)
  • Method C - One hand under the chest, the other hand under the bottom, held slightly away from the handler’s chest (53.6 per cent)
  • Method D - Rabbit on its back, which can induce tonic immobility (59.9 per cent). However, 71 per cent of participants felt this would be a negative experience for the rabbit. It was mainly used for health checks, grooming or administering medication.

Methods A and E were more commonly used by those with laboratory experience, but E was the least frequently used in all other contexts. Method B was more popular with pet owners and in all other work contexts.

Meanwhile, Methods D and E appeared to prompt a negative emotional response, with 11 participants calling method D ‘wrong’, ‘cruel’, ‘dangerous’ or ‘dreadful’. Likewise, 80 people said method E was ‘cruel’, ‘distressing’, ‘disgraceful’, ‘horrible’, ‘painful’, or ‘uncaring’. Participants were also seven times more likely to say “I was told never to do that”, in response to photos D and E.

Methods A and C were viewed as being the most unfamiliar or difficult to use, but there were fewer welfare concerns about A and B, compared to C, D and E.

The research team, writing in the Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, encouraged further research to explore rabbits’ experiences during handling, to identify methods that are easy to use, with the fewest welfare compromises.

However, if future research identifies more appropriate handling methods, researchers said this information must be disseminated in a way that will reach handlers. It must also be consistent and available across a wide range of media in order to have a significant impact on handling and, therefore, rabbit welfare.

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

RUMA CA&E extends survey deadline

News Story 1
 RUMA CA&E has extended the deadline for its online survey into vaccine availability.

Vets, SQPs, retailers and wholesalers will now have until Friday, 26 September at 5pm to submit their response.

The survey aims to further understanding into the vaccine supply challenges faced by the sector. It will also consider the short and long term impacts of disruption issues.

Insights are anonymous, and will be shared with industry stakeholders and government bodies.

The survey can be accessed here

Click here for more...
News Shorts
BSAVA publishes Guide to Nutrition in Small Animal Practice

The BSAVA has added a small animal nutrition advice booklet to its series of BSAVA guides.

The BSAVA Guide to Nutrition in Small Animal Practice offers a resource for veterinary professionals to provide appropriate nutrition for animals. As well as maintaining the wellbeing of healthy pets, the guide explores how nutritional requirements change in times of illness and disease.

The guide is divided into five sections, which explore the importance of nutritional assessment; diet types; feeding at different life stages; feeding for specific situations; and feeding for specific diseases. Online resources are also in the BSAVA Library including client handouts and videos.

It is designed to be suitable for referencing, in-depth case planning and team training sessions.

The BSAVA Guide to Nutrition in Small Animal Practice can be purchased online from the BSAVA store.