Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

New study sheds light on rabbit handling
If future research identifies more appropriate handling methods, researchers said this information must be consistent and available across a wide range of media.
Further research needed to determine rabbits’ experiences 

A new survey suggests the most popular method of rabbit handling is supporting the animal’s body against the chest, while ‘scruffing’ with rear support is the least popular.

Researchers carried out an online survey of pet owners, breeders, veterinary staff and laboratory personnel, who were shown photographs of five different handling methods.

Out of 2,644 respondents, 86.2 per cent said they had used method B (supporting rabbits against the chest); compared to method E (scruffing), which was used by 15.3 per cent.

Other methods studied were:
  • Method A - Rabbit supported with both arms (63.6 per cent)
  • Method C - One hand under the chest, the other hand under the bottom, held slightly away from the handler’s chest (53.6 per cent)
  • Method D - Rabbit on its back, which can induce tonic immobility (59.9 per cent). However, 71 per cent of participants felt this would be a negative experience for the rabbit. It was mainly used for health checks, grooming or administering medication.

Methods A and E were more commonly used by those with laboratory experience, but E was the least frequently used in all other contexts. Method B was more popular with pet owners and in all other work contexts.

Meanwhile, Methods D and E appeared to prompt a negative emotional response, with 11 participants calling method D ‘wrong’, ‘cruel’, ‘dangerous’ or ‘dreadful’. Likewise, 80 people said method E was ‘cruel’, ‘distressing’, ‘disgraceful’, ‘horrible’, ‘painful’, or ‘uncaring’. Participants were also seven times more likely to say “I was told never to do that”, in response to photos D and E.

Methods A and C were viewed as being the most unfamiliar or difficult to use, but there were fewer welfare concerns about A and B, compared to C, D and E.

The research team, writing in the Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, encouraged further research to explore rabbits’ experiences during handling, to identify methods that are easy to use, with the fewest welfare compromises.

However, if future research identifies more appropriate handling methods, researchers said this information must be disseminated in a way that will reach handlers. It must also be consistent and available across a wide range of media in order to have a significant impact on handling and, therefore, rabbit welfare.

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Birmingham Dogs Home makes urgent appeal

News Story 1
 Birmingham Dogs Home has issued an urgent winter appeal as it faces more challenges over the Christmas period.

The rescue centre has seen a dramatic increase in dogs coming into its care, and is currently caring for over 200 dogs. With rising costs and dropping temperatures, the charity is calling for urgent support.

It costs the charity £6,000 per day to continue its work.

Fi Harrison, head of fundraising and communications, said: "It's heart-breaking for our team to see the conditions some dogs arrive in. We really are their last chance and hope of survival."

More information about the appeal can be found here

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Avian flu confirmed at premises in Cornwall

A case of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 has been detected in commercial poultry at a premises near Rosudgeon, Cornwall.

All poultry on the infected site will be humanely culled, and a 3km protection zone and 10km surveillance zone have been put in place. Poultry and other captive birds in the 3km protection zone must be housed.

The case is the second avian flu case confirmed in commercial poultry this month. The H5N5 strain was detected in a premises near Hornsea, East Riding of Yorkshire, in early November. Before then, the disease had not been confirmed in captive birds in England since February.

The UK chief veterinary officer has urged bird keepers to remain alert and practise robust biosecurity.

A map of the disease control zones can be found here.