Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Vets call on George Eustice to retract badger cull statement
Examination of the data found no reduction in the prevalence of bTB infected herds in Gloucestershire or Somerset.
Open letter claims cull has not resulted in bTB decrease

Senior vets and animal protection organisations have signed an open letter expressing concern over claims that badger culling has lowered bovine TB (bTB) cases in cull zones.

The 16 vets and animal welfare experts from institutions across the UK call on George Eustice MP to retract his statement, in which he says the government’s strategy for coping with the disease ‘is delivering results’.

Mr Eustice was referring to data which suggests bTB levels in Gloucestershire and Somerset are now around half what they were before the badger culls began. But according to the letter’s signatories, ’there are approximately the same proportion of bTB affected herds now, as there were before culling started’.

The letter states that examination of the data in detail found no reduction in the prevalence of bTB infected herds in Gloucestershire or Somerset as a result of culling. Its authors note that methods used by Defra to reach their conclusion ‘merit analysis’ and that greater clarity ‘can be obtained ‘by focusing on prevalence rather than incidence.’

‘We respectfully request that Mr Eustice withdraw his inaccurate statement and that, having consulted with Mr Gove and Defra’s chief vet, he issue a corrected statement on a newly entitled document which accurately reflects bTB prevalence in cattle after four years if badger culling in Gloucestershire and Somerset,’ the letter reads.

The signatories also refer to published footage that shows how a badger took a minute to die after being shot by a cull contractor, noting increasing public unease at the animal suffering associated with the badger cull.

‘The badger cull has produced no measurable reduction in the percentage of bTB infected herds in cull zones but has produced a well-documented increase in badger harm. Neither the veterinary profession nor the general public will tolerate such abuse in plain sight,’ they write.

The letter was addressed to the editor of The Observer and published in full by Network for Animals. Organised by Dr Iain McGill, director of the Prion Interest Group, other signatories include Andrew Knight, professor of animal welfare and ethics at the University of Winchester and Richard Saunders, an RCVS specialist in zoo and wildlife medicine.

It was also signed by Dr Mark Jones, head of policy at Born Free, Dominic Dyer, CEO of the Badger Trust, and Adam Grogan, head of wildlife at the RSPCA. 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets launch new podcast for pet owners

News Story 1
 Two independent vets have launched a podcast to help owners strengthen their bond with pets. Dr Maggie Roberts and Dr Vanessa Howie, who have worked in both veterinary practice and major charities, are keen to use their experience to enable people to give pets a better life.

The venture, called Vets Talking Pets, provides advice and information on a range of topics, including how to select a suitable pet, where to obtain them and how to get the best out of your vet. Maggie and Vanessa will also discuss sensitive subjects, including end-of-life care, raw food diets and the cost of veterinary care.

The podcast can be found on all the usual podcast sites, including Podbean, Apple, Amazon Music and YouTube. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
VMD issues guidance on AVM-GSL packaging

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has shared advice on its requirements for medicines considered AVM-GSL.

The guidance explains the information that should be on the outer package, and sets out the typical maximum pack size for an AVM-GSL product. It also describes the user-friendly language, structure and phrases required on packaging and product leaflets.

AVM-GSL products do not require discussion between the purchaser and a veterinary professional. This means that clear product information is needed to support sales choices.

The information will be useful for submitting new products to the AVM-GSL category and lowering the distribution category of products from NFA-VPS to AVM-GSL.

The VMD's guidance can be accessed here.