Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

MPs call for clarity on XL bully definition
XL bully dogs will be banned from 1 February 2024.

Committee warns that current guidance could confuse public.

MPs on the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) Committee have called on the Government to offer more clarity to pet owners on the definition of the XL bully breed.

In a letter to Lord Benyon, minister for climate, environment and energy, the cross-party committee outlined its general support for the upcoming ban on the breed, but raised a number of issues that need to be addressed.

The MPs warned that current guidance risks owners misidentifying their dogs as XL bullies.

Under the guidance, a dog is considered an XL bully if it meets the minimum height measurements and ‘a substantial number of the characteristics in the official definition’.

In their letter, the committee point out a lack of guidance on what ‘substantial’ means in this context, which could cause confusion for members of the public and lead to dogs being registered as XL bullies which do not fit the criteria.

More than 4,000 owners have already applied to register their dog.

The MPs also called for an extension of the deadline for neutering dogs that are under seven months old on 31 January 2024, as scientific evidence suggests that neutering too young can cause health problems in large breeds. The same request has previously been made by the British Veterinary Association.

Concerns were also raised in the letter about whether there are enough experts to identify XL bullies and whether dog wardens, shelters and other relevant organisations have enough capacity and funding to cope with a potential rise in abandonments.

The impact on the mental health of those working in the veterinary and related sectors was also raised. According to the letter: ‘Early data suggest that a significant proportion of vets could refuse to euthanise a healthy animal, as they are entitled to do under their code of conduct.’

Dr Neil Hudson MP, member of the EFRA Committee and veterinary surgeon, said: “Our EFRA Committee supports the upcoming ban on XL bully dogs for public and other animal safety, but we are making recommendations to Government to help with the practical and compassionate implementation of the ban.”

Image © Shutterstock

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets launch new podcast for pet owners

News Story 1
 Two independent vets have launched a podcast to help owners strengthen their bond with pets. Dr Maggie Roberts and Dr Vanessa Howie, who have worked in both veterinary practice and major charities, are keen to use their experience to enable people to give pets a better life.

The venture, called Vets Talking Pets, provides advice and information on a range of topics, including how to select a suitable pet, where to obtain them and how to get the best out of your vet. Maggie and Vanessa will also discuss sensitive subjects, including end-of-life care, raw food diets and the cost of veterinary care.

The podcast can be found on all the usual podcast sites, including Podbean, Apple, Amazon Music and YouTube. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
VMD issues guidance on AVM-GSL packaging

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has shared advice on its requirements for medicines considered AVM-GSL.

The guidance explains the information that should be on the outer package, and sets out the typical maximum pack size for an AVM-GSL product. It also describes the user-friendly language, structure and phrases required on packaging and product leaflets.

AVM-GSL products do not require discussion between the purchaser and a veterinary professional. This means that clear product information is needed to support sales choices.

The information will be useful for submitting new products to the AVM-GSL category and lowering the distribution category of products from NFA-VPS to AVM-GSL.

The VMD's guidance can be accessed here.