Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

WSAVA condemns cosmetic alteration of pets
“Elective surgeries should not be performed simply to alter an animal’s appearance or behaviour based on human preferences or tradition” – Heather Bacon.
The organisation has published a new position statement on the issue.

The World Small Animal Veterinary Association has issued a position statement expressing its opposition to the physical alteration of an animal’s body for either cosmetic reasons or to control behaviour.

Prepared by the WSAVA’s Animal Welfare Committee (AWC), it is hoped that the statement will support veterinary teams and organisations in preventing and discouraging practices including onychectomy, devoicing, tail docking, and ear cropping.

Although such procedures are illegal in many countries, they still continue to be performed. In the UK, for example, it is legal to import a dog with cropped ears. Organisations such as the British Veterinary Association have argued that this has created a loophole which has allowed ear cropping to become popular among some owners.

The statement argues that such procedures ‘demonstrate a lack of recognition of the intrinsic value of animals as sentient beings and sends the message that they are commodities to be altered and exploited in line with the preferences of people.’

The WSAVA is asking veterinary teams to help educate clients about the harm that cosmetic and behavioural-control procedures can cause.

Heather Bacon, chair of the AWC, said: “Elective surgeries should not be performed simply to alter an animal’s appearance or behaviour based on human preferences or tradition. A robust cost-benefit analysis and application of the evidence is always necessary to ensure the best health and welfare outcomes for our companion animals.

“All veterinarians have an ethical obligation to act in the best interests of their patients. We can all improve animal health and welfare outcomes by demonstrating leadership and evidence-based practice on these contentious issues, and by proactively engaging with communities to normalise and promote the value of healthy cats and dogs with intact toes, ears, tails and voices. We hope our position statement will support colleagues around the world in achieving this.”

The position statement can be read here.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets launch new podcast for pet owners

News Story 1
 Two independent vets have launched a podcast to help owners strengthen their bond with pets. Dr Maggie Roberts and Dr Vanessa Howie, who have worked in both veterinary practice and major charities, are keen to use their experience to enable people to give pets a better life.

The venture, called Vets Talking Pets, provides advice and information on a range of topics, including how to select a suitable pet, where to obtain them and how to get the best out of your vet. Maggie and Vanessa will also discuss sensitive subjects, including end-of-life care, raw food diets and the cost of veterinary care.

The podcast can be found on all the usual podcast sites, including Podbean, Apple, Amazon Music and YouTube. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
VMD issues guidance on AVM-GSL packaging

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has shared advice on its requirements for medicines considered AVM-GSL.

The guidance explains the information that should be on the outer package, and sets out the typical maximum pack size for an AVM-GSL product. It also describes the user-friendly language, structure and phrases required on packaging and product leaflets.

AVM-GSL products do not require discussion between the purchaser and a veterinary professional. This means that clear product information is needed to support sales choices.

The information will be useful for submitting new products to the AVM-GSL category and lowering the distribution category of products from NFA-VPS to AVM-GSL.

The VMD's guidance can be accessed here.