Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel
NFU raises questions about RSPCA role
Union calls for charity to clarify its role at Ramsgate following report

Following the AHVLA report on the events at the port of Ramsgate last year, the National Farmers Union (NFU) has called for the RSPCA to clarify its role at the port.

It is felt that the recent report highlights confusion between the AHVLA and RSPCA over how to handle the incident. The timeline of events issued by the agency along with the report details the agency's intention to transport the vehicle in question to contingency premises 24 miles from Ramsgate. The RSPCA however objected to the proposal, and "informed the AHVLA inspector that they (the RSPCA)...were not prepared to allow the use of a vehicle that was unsuitable and overstocked, to transport the animals to the emergency facility."

Deputy president of the NFU Meurig Raymond claimed the RSPCA "appeared to have asserted significant influence over Government officials on the ground," during the incident which resulted in more than forty sheep having to be euthanised.

Mr Raymond insisted: "It is highly concerning that, although the RSPCA has no official role at the port, from an early stage, they were making objections to agreed contingency plans, making interventions from their legal team and, within an hour of a problem being found, they had ‘instructed’ AHVLA officers to unload animals at the port, despite RSPCA previously highlighting the lack of suitable facilities for handling animals."

The RSPCA however has defended its role during the incident, insisting the report "clearly states that all the key decisions on the day were taken by the competent authorities; AHVLA officers." The charity referred to its objection to the initial contingency plan as "well-founded" as a "fist-sized gap" was later found between the the deck floor and the shell of the vehicle, posing a significant risk to the animals.

The AHVLA timeline describes events from the inspection of the first vehicle at the port at 8:35am, to the arrival of the replacement vehicle at 1:00am the following morning, during which several difficulties are reported in implementing a contingency plan. As a result of the AHVLA's recent report, various alterations have been made to procedures to prevent a repeat of the incident.

To view the timeline of events click here.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
New form for online veterinary medicines retailers

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has produced a new online form for retailers wishing to sell veterinary medicines on the internet.

The form replace the previous Word version and is part of the VMD's ongoing commitment to digitise its processes. Anyone retailing prescription medicines online, including POM-V, POM-VPS and NFA-VPS categories, is lawfully required to register with the VMD before trading.

The change only applies to new applicants. Retailers already listed on the VMD's Register of Online Retailers or registered under the Accredited Internet Retailer Scheme (AIRS) do not need to do anything.